Progress against the field
From Belgium 2025 to Amsterdam 2026, the field gained 10:08 on Aragorn De La Fuente and Tom Spuijbroek.
The clock says 3:00 slower, but the races themselves got 7:08 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Maastricht 2025 → Amsterdam 2026: 6:28 in 124 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Relay · Mixed1:10:1515/69Beat 78%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:27:21311/342Beat 9%
↑ 124 days after Maastricht 2025, with Tom Spuijbroek 6:28 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:34 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:06 faster for everyone, so 6:28 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →4:06 faster This pair10:34 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Relay · Mixed1:17:4419/49Beat 61%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:39:09 PB599/701Beat 15%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men1:37:55789/821Beat 4%
↑ 133 days after Heerenveen 2025, with Tom Spuijbroek 18:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
17:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:04 faster for everyone: 18:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:04 faster This pair17:43 slower -
Heerenveen9 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:20:12 PB399/529Beat 25%
↑ 34 days after Belgium 2025, with Tom Spuijbroek 2:11 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 better than the field: 4:09 faster on the clock, against 1:58 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:58 faster This pair4:09 faster -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Men1:24:21757/898Beat 16%