Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025, Tim Reynolds lost 1:39 to the field.
The clock says 4:29 faster, but the races themselves got 6:08 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Glasgow 2025 → Cardiff 2025: 2:52 in 79 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:44:48 PB653/693Beat 6%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:22:41 PB1390/2779Beat 50%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:36 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, so 2:34 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete5:36 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:28:171075/1821Beat 41%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 7:05 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:05 behind the field: 4:29 slower on the clock, against 2:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete4:29 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:23:48781/1401Beat 44%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025 2:52 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:52 better than the field: 3:22 faster on the clock, against 0:30 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:30 faster This athlete3:22 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:27:10954/1445Beat 34%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:16:26 PB526/719Beat 27%