Progress against the field
From London 2024 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 2:39 on Peter Jameson and Alex Reader.
The clock says 2:12 faster, but the races themselves got 4:51 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men59:51 PB51/605Beat 92%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:54288/2102Beat 86%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Alex Reader 0:56 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:07 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:03 faster for everyone, so 0:56 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 faster This pair1:07 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:03 PB55/559Beat 90%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:17:12 PB207/639Beat 68%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:01175/1010Beat 83%
↑ 155 days after London 2024, with Alex Reader 1:43 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:48 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:43 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This pair1:05 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:04:0683/444Beat 81%