Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and Warsaw 2025, Giuseppe Scalisi and Daniel Crisci lost 1:33 to the field.
The clock says 3:40 faster, but the races themselves got 5:13 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:53 PB265/1474Beat 82%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:28 PB66/304Beat 78%
↑ 31 days after Glasgow 2025, with Daniel Crisci 0:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:54 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:08 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:14 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This pair1:54 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:06:22342/947Beat 64%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Daniel Crisci 1:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:46 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:05 faster for everyone, so 1:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair1:46 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:08:08288/984Beat 71%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:10:21229/855Beat 73%
-
Berlin20 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Men1:08:45196/421Beat 53%