Progress against the field
Natalie Canning and Danielle Reid have dropped 11:42 behind the field from London 2023 to London Excel 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 4:11 quicker, so 7:31 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 370 days between London 2024 and London Excel 2025, cost 9:25 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Danielle Reid, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:24:27766/1599Beat 52%
↑ 370 days after London 2024, with Danielle Reid 9:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:25 behind the field: 6:17 slower on the clock, against 3:08 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:08 faster This pair6:17 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:23:27111/423Beat 74%
↑ 193 days after London 2025 5:18 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:18 behind the field: 1:06 slower on the clock, against 4:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:12 faster This athlete1:06 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:21 PB357/1368Beat 74%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:10149/517Beat 71%
↑ 369 days after London 2023, with Danielle Reid 2:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:17 behind the field: 1:14 slower on the clock, against 1:03 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This pair1:14 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Women1:16:56 PB256/1096Beat 77%