Progress against the field
From London 2024 to Birmingham 2025, the field gained 7:15 on Katie Wade and Victoria Howard.
Over the same races everyone got 6:09 quicker, so 1:06 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 224 days between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025, cost 3:46 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:36164/1111Beat 85%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Victoria Howard 3:46 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:46 behind the field: 1:15 slower on the clock, against 2:31 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair1:15 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:21 PB106/1051Beat 90%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025, with Victoria Howard 2:04 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:06 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:10 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:04 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:10 faster This pair1:06 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:27156/857Beat 82%
↑ 56 days after London 2024, with Victoria Howard 1:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:57 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:28 faster for everyone: 1:25 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:28 faster This pair0:57 slower -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:13:3073/517Beat 86%