Progress against the field
Amber Mcclelland has dropped 7:45 behind the field from Glasgow 2024 to London 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 5:20 quicker, so 2:25 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
190 days between Birmingham 2024 and London 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:47 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:27:28545/1368Beat 60%
↑ 190 days after Birmingham 2024 3:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:13 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:00 faster for everyone, so 3:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:00 faster This athlete1:13 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Pro · Women1:38:38 PB69/84Beat 18%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:28:41305/846Beat 64%
↑ 174 days after Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 0:46 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:44 slower for everyone: 0:46 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 slower This athlete0:58 slower -
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Individual Open · Women1:27:43552/1307Beat 58%
↑ 63 days after Glasgow 2024 4:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:44 behind the field: 2:40 slower on the clock, against 2:04 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:04 faster This athlete2:40 slower -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:25:03 PB225/816Beat 72%