Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Amy Neill and Paige Mcmeeken pulled 1:10 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:11 quicker, so 6:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 237 days between Glasgow 2024 and Birmingham 2024, still ended 4:41 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:09 PB150/693Beat 78%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:02 PB44/1051Beat 96%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Paige Mcmeeken 3:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:48 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:19 faster for everyone, so 3:31 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:19 faster This pair0:48 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:09:5012/397Beat 97%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024, with Paige Mcmeeken 4:41 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:33 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:52 faster for everyone, so 4:41 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:52 faster This pair5:33 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:15:2398/1029Beat 91%