Progress against the field
Between Malaga 2024 and Malaga 2025, Suzanne Mcgloughlin and Michael Mcgloughlin lost 7:32 to the field.
The clock says 0:41 faster, but the races themselves got 8:13 quicker for everyone.
216 days between Malaga 2024 and Dublin 2024 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:26 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:09281/693Beat 60%
↑ 126 days after Dublin 2024, with Michael Mcgloughlin 5:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:14 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:52 faster for everyone: 5:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:52 faster This pair3:14 slower -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:55 PB113/492Beat 77%
↑ 216 days after Malaga 2024, with Michael Mcgloughlin 2:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:55 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:21 faster for everyone, so 2:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:21 faster This pair3:55 faster -
Malaga13 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:50110/278Beat 60%
-
Dublin28 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:0789/255Beat 65%
-
Hamburg26 Nov 2022Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:5794/205Beat 54%