Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Tom Eckersley lost 0:59 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:21 quicker, so 4:22 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
3 races · 3 events
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:22:22 PB779/1445Beat 46%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024 0:59 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:21 faster for everyone, so 0:59 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:21 faster This athlete4:22 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:39:41 PB700/719Beat 3%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:26:441033/1916Beat 46%