Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2023 to Glasgow 2025, Daniel Anderson and Louise Wilks have moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
Over the same races everyone got 3:18 quicker, so 3:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
385 days between Glasgow 2023 and Glasgow 2024 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 5:08 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:38 PB417/1815Beat 77%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:39306/861Beat 65%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Louise Wilks 5:21 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:14 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:07 faster for everyone: 5:21 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:07 faster This pair1:14 slower -
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:16:16488/865Beat 44%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:25 PB207/850Beat 76%
↑ 385 days after Glasgow 2023, with Louise Wilks 5:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:19 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:49 slower for everyone: 5:08 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:49 slower This pair4:19 faster -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:44130/247Beat 47%
-
Singapore ExpoDate unknownDoubles Open · Men1:22:50334/819Beat 59%