Progress against the field
Jason Burgess has dropped 0:32 behind the field from Glasgow 2023 to Birmingham 2024.
Over the same races everyone got 4:49 quicker, so 4:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:03 PB9/494Beat 98%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:09:00 PB138/1916Beat 93%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 1:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:21 faster for everyone, so 1:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete1:05 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:10:05160/1784Beat 91%
↑ 385 days after Glasgow 2023 0:44 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:44 better than the field: 3:12 faster on the clock, against 2:28 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:28 faster This athlete3:12 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Men1:06:40110/467Beat 76%
↑ 371 days after Birmingham 2022, with Jim Bailey 4:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:59 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:48 faster for everyone: 4:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:48 faster This pair3:59 slower -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Individual Open · Men1:13:17185/974Beat 81%
-
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Men1:02:41 PB49/358Beat 86%
-
World Championships ManchesterDate unknownDoubles Open · Men1:07:10179/250Beat 28%