Progress against the field
From New York 2026 to Washington DC 2026, the field gained 1:22 on Rachel Decker.
Over the same races everyone got 5:44 quicker, so 4:22 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Tampa22 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:12:40 PB55/206Beat 73%
-
Washington DC3 Sep 2026Individual Open · Women1:34:24 PB157/342Beat 54%
↑ 98 days after New York 2026 1:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:44 faster for everyone, so 1:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:44 faster This athlete4:22 faster -
New York28 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:38:46167/365Beat 54%
-
Miami3 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:09:02 PB18/1037Beat 98%
↑ 182 days after Toronto 2025, with Alex Pividal 0:29 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:50 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:29 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:50 faster This pair3:21 faster -
Toronto3 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:2318/366Beat 95%