Progress against the field
From Beijing I 2026 to Shenzhen 2026, the field gained 7:09 on 雨桐 王.
Over the same races everyone got 10:06 quicker, so 2:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
19 races · 9 events
-
Beijing10 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Women1:07:176/152Beat 96%
↑ 40 days after Chengdu 2026 2:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:59 behind the field: 0:48 slower on the clock, against 2:11 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:11 faster This athlete0:48 slower -
Beijing10 Sep 2026Relay · Mixed52:572/260Beat 99%
-
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed55:25 PB2/863Beat 100%
↑ 126 days after Wuhan 2026, with 易龙 邵秦 1:01 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:57 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:58 faster for everyone, so 1:01 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:58 faster This pair2:57 faster -
Shenzhen15 Aug 2026Individual Open · Women1:01:24 PB1/636Beat 100%
↑ 14 days after Chengdu 2026 3:29 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:32 faster for everyone, so 3:29 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:32 faster This athlete3:03 faster -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:2577/528Beat 85%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Relay · Mixed57:045/277Beat 98%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Women1:04:271/435Beat 100%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026 0:53 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:44 faster for everyone: 0:53 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 faster This athlete0:09 slower -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Pro · Women1:06:29 PB4/100Beat 96%
-
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Individual Open · Women1:04:181/390Beat 100%
↑ 49 days after Shanghai 2026 1:49 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:49 behind the field: 2:11 slower on the clock, against 0:22 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:22 slower This athlete2:11 slower -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Individual Pro · Women1:09:203/103Beat 97%
↑ 49 days after Shanghai 2026 0:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:29 slower on the clock, and the race was 2:37 slower for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →2:37 slower This athlete2:29 slower -
Shanghai16 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:02:071/639Beat 100%
↑ 56 days after Beijing I 2026 0:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:12 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:58 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:12 faster This athlete2:14 faster -
Shanghai16 May 2026Individual Pro · Women1:06:513/95Beat 97%
↑ 56 days after Beijing I 2026 1:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:01 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:40 faster for everyone, so 1:39 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:40 faster This athlete0:01 faster -
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Relay · Women1:02:561/83Beat 99%
-
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed58:221/274Beat 100%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:04:211/633Beat 100%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:25:30102/289Beat 65%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Women1:06:524/93Beat 96%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Women1:14:226/76Beat 92%
-
Beijing23 Aug 2025Individual Pro · Women1:23:0314/78Beat 82%