Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Rome 2026, Anton Van Loggerenberg and Candice Ewing got 2:24 faster than the field.
The clock says 4:00 faster, but the races themselves got 1:36 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:12 PB20/1051Beat 98%
↑ 183 days after London Olympia 2026, with Candice Ewing 0:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:01 slower for everyone: 0:59 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:01 slower This pair0:58 faster -
Cape Town14 Aug 2026Individual Open · Men59:06 PB3/652Beat 100%
-
Cape Town14 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:2220/645Beat 97%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:5731/913Beat 97%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:1032/887Beat 96%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Candice Ewing 1:25 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:25 better than the field: 3:02 faster on the clock, against 1:37 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This pair3:02 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:52 PB206/1815Beat 89%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:12111/1474Beat 93%