Progress against the field
From Rotterdam 2026 to Heerenveen 2026, the field gained 3:03 on Carolien Van Eggermond.
Over the same races everyone got 3:19 quicker, so 0:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
18 races · 16 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Individual Open · Women1:23:4292/577Beat 84%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:30 PB34/240Beat 86%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:20697/825Beat 16%
↑ 84 days after Mechelen 2026, with Andre Loogman 0:17 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 slower on the clock, but the race was 2:31 slower for everyone, so this was 0:17 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 slower This pair2:14 slower -
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:3711/110Beat 90%
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:19:3161/608Beat 90%
↑ 29 days after Rotterdam 2026 3:03 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:19 faster for everyone, so 3:03 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:19 faster This athlete0:16 faster -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:19:4781/695Beat 88%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:06 PB290/962Beat 70%
↑ 355 days after Belgium 2025, with Andre Loogman 3:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:53 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:13 faster for everyone, which leaves this 3:20 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:13 faster This pair0:53 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:22:31274/507Beat 46%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:19:48184/1122Beat 84%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:45230/803Beat 71%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:17283/1379Beat 80%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:20:3984/590Beat 86%
↑ 204 days after Rotterdam 2025 2:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:25 behind the field: 1:31 slower on the clock, against 0:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 faster This athlete1:31 slower -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:59191/722Beat 74%
↑ 441 days after Maastricht 2024, with Andre Loogman 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 3:29 faster on the clock, against 3:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This pair3:29 faster -
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Individual Open · Women1:19:0853/506Beat 90%
↑ 140 days after Amsterdam 2024 0:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 better than the field: 3:11 faster on the clock, against 2:49 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 faster This athlete3:11 faster -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:22:19116/678Beat 83%
↑ 187 days after Rotterdam 2024 6:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:25 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:42 faster for everyone: 6:07 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:42 faster This athlete4:25 slower -
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Individual Open · Women1:17:54 PB53/585Beat 91%
-
Maastricht20 Jan 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:2887/230Beat 62%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownIndividual Open · Women1:25:125/28Beat 82%