Progress against the field
Kwinten Verstuyft has dropped 0:48 behind the field from Belgium 2025 to Maastricht 2026.
The clock says 3:18 faster, but the races themselves got 4:06 quicker for everyone.
The biggest step was Gent 2025 → Amsterdam 2026: 3:51 on the field in 40 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 15 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:00:20 PB20/399Beat 95%
↑ 157 days after Rotterdam 2026 0:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 better than the field: 0:57 faster on the clock, against 0:14 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:14 faster This athlete0:57 faster -
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Relay · Mixed52:135/20Beat 75%
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:01:1714/348Beat 96%
↑ 20 days after Mechelen 2026 0:41 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 slower for everyone: 0:41 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 slower This athlete0:42 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:00:3536/457Beat 92%
↑ 64 days after Amsterdam 2026 1:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:19 faster for everyone, so 1:57 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 faster This athlete0:22 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:00:5715/243Beat 94%
↑ 40 days after Gent 2025 3:51 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:22 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:31 faster for everyone, so 3:51 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:31 faster This athlete5:22 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:06:1941/305Beat 87%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025 7:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:20 faster for everyone: 7:03 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:20 faster This athlete3:43 slower -
Hamburg2 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men51:19 PB2/72Beat 97%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:3618/208Beat 91%
↑ 167 days after Belgium 2025 2:57 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 1:55 slower for everyone and the clock still says 1:02 faster: 2:57 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 slower This athlete1:02 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · MenDNF—
-
Paris 118 Apr 2025Doubles Pro · Men52:2713/438Beat 97%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Pro · Men1:03:389/203Beat 96%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Men51:21 PB12/655Beat 98%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men51:441/855Beat 100%
↑ 187 days after Rotterdam 2024, with Louis Osselaer 2:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:36 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:29 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:53 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This pair0:36 faster -
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Men52:201/722Beat 100%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men54:4511/387Beat 97%