Progress against the field
From Amsterdam 2026 to Heerenveen 2026, the field gained 1:57 on Mirjam Laanstra and Anneke Wartena.
Over the same races everyone got 2:54 quicker, so 0:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Relay · Women1:07:235/43Beat 88%
-
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:0141/405Beat 90%
-
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:1844/513Beat 91%
↑ 49 days after Mechelen 2026, with Anneke Wartena 1:43 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:43 behind the field: 0:29 slower on the clock, against 1:14 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:14 faster This pair0:29 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:11:49 PB29/285Beat 90%
↑ 64 days after Amsterdam 2026, with Anneke Wartena 0:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:26 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:14 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:40 faster This pair1:26 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:1519/307Beat 94%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:27:33 PB172/619Beat 72%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:45282/1160Beat 76%
-
Heerenveen9 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:2247/292Beat 84%