Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 20:48 on Pamela Lewis.
The clock says 6:54 slower, but the races themselves got 13:54 quicker for everyone.
267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:50 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
11 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women2:41:33274/279Beat 2%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 10:33 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:50 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:43 faster for everyone: 10:33 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:43 faster This athlete7:50 slower -
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Women2:19:48403/405Beat 1%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women2:33:43383/389Beat 2%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 12:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:44 behind the field: 11:35 slower on the clock, against 1:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This athlete11:35 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Women3:11:53148/148Beat 0%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 6:13 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:01 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:12 faster for everyone: 6:13 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:12 faster This athlete4:01 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women3:07:52 PB146/146Beat 0%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women2:22:081523/1542Beat 1%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 2:50 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 2:50 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete0:16 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:56:35 PB880/904Beat 3%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women2:22:24820/830Beat 1%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 5:08 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:16 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:52 faster for everyone: 5:08 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:52 faster This athlete2:16 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women2:20:08 PB536/539Beat 1%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024 10:27 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
14:31 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, so 10:27 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This athlete14:31 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women2:34:39557/564Beat 1%
-
World ChampionshipsDate unknownIndividual Open · Women2:28:0749/51Beat 4%