Progress against the field
From Johannesburg I 2025 to Johannesburg 2025, the field gained 7:03 on Kirsten Keightley-Smith and Andrew Keightley-Smith.
Over the same races everyone got 3:55 quicker, so 3:08 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Johannesburg30 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:27:24 PB198/1061Beat 81%
-
Johannesburg29 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:4056/594Beat 91%
↑ 133 days after Cape Town 2025, with Andrew Keightley-Smith 2:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:22 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:31 slower for everyone: 2:51 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:31 slower This pair6:22 slower -
Cape Town19 Jul 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:18 PB26/547Beat 95%
↑ 140 days after Johannesburg I 2025, with Andrew Keightley-Smith 4:12 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:14 faster on the clock, yet the race was 7:26 faster for everyone, so 4:12 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →7:26 faster This pair3:14 faster -
Johannesburg I1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:3218/372Beat 95%