Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Manchester 2024, Dan Mclaughlin lost 4:09 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:14 quicker, so 0:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 9 events
-
Berlin22 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:19:11 PB245/686Beat 64%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:12:09165/404Beat 59%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:05 PB630/1474Beat 57%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:06:46 PB670/2102Beat 68%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:22153/269Beat 43%
-
Incheon17 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:44:08379/497Beat 24%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:28:20847/1206Beat 30%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024 4:09 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:14 faster for everyone, so 4:09 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:14 faster This athlete0:05 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:28:251108/1916Beat 42%
-
Incheon19 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:44:59209/273Beat 23%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Individual Open · MenDNF—