Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to Berlin 2026, the field gained 5:09 on Jakub Protasiewicz and Gemma Grainger.
Over the same races everyone got 2:29 quicker, so 2:40 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:23175/293Beat 40%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:41 PB178/560Beat 68%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:12489/960Beat 49%
↑ 23 days after Cardiff 2026, with Gemma Grainger 4:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:27 slower for everyone: 4:31 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:27 slower This pair4:58 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:14198/419Beat 53%
↑ 13 days after Malaga 2026, with Gemma Grainger 0:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:12 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:12 faster This pair0:09 faster -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:23480/842Beat 43%
↑ 85 days after Manchester 2026, with Gemma Grainger 0:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:44 faster for everyone, so 0:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:44 faster This pair2:09 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:32484/824Beat 41%