Progress against the field
From Amsterdam 2026 to Maastricht 2026, Pepijn Verzellenberg and Reno Van Aalst got 0:42 faster than the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 0:28 faster on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Pro · Men, with Reno Van Aalst, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:02:24 PB90/316Beat 72%
↑ 241 days after Amsterdam 2026, with Reno Van Aalst 0:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:14 slower for everyone and the clock still says 0:28 faster: 0:42 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:14 slower This pair0:28 faster -
Heerenveen14 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:41 PB22/461Beat 95%
↑ 29 days after Rotterdam 2026, with Sanne Middelkoop 1:29 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:12 faster for everyone, so 1:29 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:12 faster This pair0:43 faster -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Relay · Men57:149/79Beat 89%
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:2432/1047Beat 97%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:02:5228/94Beat 70%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:30:10 PB943/1539Beat 39%