Progress against the field
Between Cologne 2025 and Rome 2026, Edgar Ruche lost 2:14 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 9:28 quicker, so 7:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 191 days between Paris 2025 and Lisboa 2026, cost 7:34 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
20 races · 14 events
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:36 PB41/478Beat 91%
↑ 148 days after Barcelona 2026 2:23 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:23 better than the field: 3:12 faster on the clock, against 0:49 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:49 faster This athlete3:12 faster -
Geneva9 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men55:46 PB13/1072Beat 99%
↑ 252 days after Turin 2026, with Thibault Gibrat 0:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:26 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:07 faster for everyone, so 0:41 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 faster This pair0:26 faster -
Geneva9 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men59:3958/353Beat 84%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:00:083/1062Beat 100%
↑ 145 days after Lisboa 2026 0:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:00 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:40 faster for everyone, so 0:20 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This athlete3:00 faster -
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:29 PB28/434Beat 94%
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Individual Pro · Men1:06:4895/618Beat 85%
-
Lisboa1 May 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:0820/887Beat 98%
↑ 191 days after Paris 2025 7:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:34 behind the field: 3:05 slower on the clock, against 4:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:29 faster This athlete3:05 slower -
Cologne16 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men58:1420/526Beat 96%
-
Cologne16 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:08:3743/455Beat 91%
-
Toulouse19 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:06:4233/325Beat 90%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men56:1213/1060Beat 99%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:06:2750/247Beat 80%
-
Paris22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:03 PB2/1397Beat 100%
↑ 11 days after Geneva 2025 3:28 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:38 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:50 slower for everyone: 3:28 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:50 slower This athlete2:38 faster -
Geneva11 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men57:5015/796Beat 98%
-
Geneva11 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:4123/1386Beat 98%
↑ 15 days after Rome 2025 0:42 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:59 faster for everyone, so 0:42 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:59 faster This athlete0:17 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men56:249/775Beat 99%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:5840/1367Beat 97%
↑ 169 days after Cologne 2025 2:14 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:10 faster for everyone, so 2:14 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:10 faster This athlete4:24 faster -
Cologne10 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:2261/1182Beat 95%
-
St. GallenDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:12:16 PB105/572Beat 82%
-
NiceDate unknownIndividual Open · Men1:02:0231/1562Beat 98%