Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and London 2025, Jade Herring and Emma Starling kept pace with the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:35 quicker, so 2:22 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:22:22 PB89/425Beat 79%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:09241/1599Beat 85%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:28 PB237/889Beat 73%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:33 PB156/1118Beat 86%
↑ 155 days after London 2024, with Emma Starling 0:13 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:35 faster for everyone, so 0:13 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:35 faster This pair2:22 faster -
London3 May 2025Relay · Mixed1:07:1645/137Beat 67%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:15:55234/1150Beat 80%