Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 1:57 on Michelle Haines and Andrew Wilds.
Over the same races everyone got 6:09 quicker, so 4:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Andrew Wilds, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
11 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:33 PB488/1159Beat 58%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Andrew Wilds 0:23 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:00 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:37 faster for everyone, so 0:23 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This pair2:00 faster -
Lisboa1 May 2026Relay · Women1:28:2624/34Beat 29%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:33383/848Beat 55%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026, with Andrew Wilds 1:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:31 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:07 faster for everyone, so 1:36 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:07 faster This pair0:31 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:04519/1198Beat 57%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Andrew Wilds 0:44 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:41 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, so 0:44 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This pair1:41 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:45488/824Beat 41%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:57:07 PB295/315Beat 6%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:19 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:16 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 faster This athlete0:03 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Women1:57:10130/141Beat 8%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:21333/470Beat 29%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025, with Andrew Wilds 1:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:16 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 1:42 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair3:16 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:37603/841Beat 28%
↑ 123 days after Manchester 2024, with Andrew Wilds 3:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:15 behind the field: 1:39 slower on the clock, against 1:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This pair1:39 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:25:58302/410Beat 26%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024, with Andrew Wilds 0:05 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:26 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:31 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair2:26 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:24675/894Beat 25%