Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Cardiff 2026, the field gained 3:51 on Isobel Hurst.
Over the same races everyone got 3:54 quicker, so 0:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
12 races · 10 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:15:0010/400Beat 98%
↑ 189 days after Birmingham 2025 3:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:21 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:10 faster for everyone: 3:31 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:10 faster This athlete0:21 slower -
Bilbao7 Feb 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:08:27 PB16/69Beat 77%
-
Verona5 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:10:0314/87Beat 84%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Relay · Women1:02:012/58Beat 97%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:39 PB58/829Beat 93%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 0:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:24 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:44 faster for everyone, so 0:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 faster This athlete0:24 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:12:3326/61Beat 57%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Relay · Mixed59:474/53Beat 93%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:49 PB106/892Beat 88%
-
Barcelona25 Apr 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:10:3414/43Beat 67%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:04:36 PB3/195Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:15:0376/830Beat 91%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:5738/857Beat 96%