Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Michelle Nesbitt-Burrell lost 9:29 to the field.
The clock says 5:16 slower, but the races themselves got 4:13 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:31:28176/400Beat 56%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 7:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:09 behind the field: 6:00 slower on the clock, against 1:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This athlete6:00 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:18:30 PB64/138Beat 54%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Relay · Women1:14:4732/141Beat 77%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:25:28 PB396/1379Beat 71%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:44 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:04 faster for everyone, so 2:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete0:44 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:26:1297/380Beat 75%