Progress against the field
From London 2024 to Cardiff 2026, the field gained 2:26 on Ann Mickle.
The clock says 6:33 faster, but the races themselves got 8:59 quicker for everyone.
215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:16 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:23 PB605/1246Beat 51%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:13:24 PB21/351Beat 94%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 0:46 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:23 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:09 faster for everyone, so 0:46 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This athlete0:23 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:13:47117/1542Beat 92%
↑ 215 days after London 2025 3:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:11 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:27 faster for everyone, so 3:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:27 faster This athlete0:11 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:13:58104/1368Beat 92%
↑ 155 days after London 2024 1:36 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 better than the field: 5:59 faster on the clock, against 4:23 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This athlete5:59 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:19:57106/940Beat 89%