Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Tom Farr lost 1:06 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:59 quicker, so 6:53 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The field was beaten in 3 of 4 comparisons.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:14121/646Beat 81%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 0:46 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:29 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:43 faster for everyone, so 0:46 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:43 faster This athlete2:29 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:43226/913Beat 75%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 5:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:06 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:48 faster for everyone: 5:54 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This athlete3:06 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:11:37 PB255/1452Beat 82%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 1:36 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 better than the field: 4:01 faster on the clock, against 2:25 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete4:01 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:38142/529Beat 73%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 2:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:29 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:03 faster for everyone, so 2:26 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete3:29 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:07652/1821Beat 64%