Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Manchester 2026, Tom Oxley and Troy Pannett lost 1:34 to the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 1:32 slower on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 7 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men53:57 PB12/302Beat 96%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men54:227/794Beat 99%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Troy Pannett 1:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:34 behind the field: 1:32 slower on the clock, against 0:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:02 faster This pair1:32 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Men51:563/69Beat 96%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men57:58 PB1/529Beat 100%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:38264/2102Beat 87%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:05:46 PB84/462Beat 82%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men52:50 PB2/189Beat 99%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men59:146/63Beat 91%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men55:5014/1105Beat 99%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Men54:5416/148Beat 89%