Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Birmingham 2025, Oliver Muntz lost 0:57 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:53 quicker, so 6:56 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
16 races · 13 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men56:41 PB62/476Beat 87%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026, with Matthew Parker 0:39 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:33 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:54 faster for everyone, so 0:39 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This pair2:33 faster -
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:06 PB21/852Beat 98%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men55:31 PB64/455Beat 86%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men59:1449/202Beat 76%
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:2124/141Beat 83%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:07:26282/794Beat 65%
↑ 418 days after London 2024, with Keith Davies 1:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:16 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:01 faster for everyone: 1:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:01 faster This pair0:16 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:0712/312Beat 96%
↑ 271 days after Manchester 2025, with Claire Boden 0:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:02 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:18 faster for everyone, so 0:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:18 faster This pair2:02 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:18 PB74/1600Beat 95%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 0:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:59 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:03 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete0:59 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men57:0326/563Beat 95%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025, with Matthew Parker 0:59 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:28 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:59 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:28 faster This pair0:29 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men57:3259/947Beat 94%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:06:17106/1445Beat 93%
↑ 117 days after Dublin 2024 2:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 2:33 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete0:33 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:0949/733Beat 93%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:33145/521Beat 72%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:10258/984Beat 74%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:06:5057/1221Beat 95%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2024 1:40 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:44 faster for everyone, so 1:40 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:44 faster This athlete5:24 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:12:14114/816Beat 86%