Progress against the field
Charlie Appleby and Neil Ham have dropped 0:59 behind the field from Malaga 2025 to London Excel 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 5:34 quicker, so 4:35 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
215 days between Malaga 2025 and Birmingham 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:39 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:05:1486/312Beat 72%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men58:08 PB46/302Beat 85%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:08 PB374/2102Beat 82%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Neil Ham 2:40 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:31 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:51 faster for everyone, so 2:40 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair4:31 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:39398/1177Beat 66%
↑ 215 days after Malaga 2025, with Neil Ham 3:39 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:43 faster for everyone, so 3:39 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:43 faster This pair0:04 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:43222/704Beat 69%