Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and London Excel 2025, Georgina Kelly lost 1:33 to the field.
The clock says 4:46 faster, but the races themselves got 6:19 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:29:40110/138Beat 20%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Anna Wade 5:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:54 behind the field: 5:52 slower on the clock, against 0:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:02 faster This pair5:52 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:49 PB14/193Beat 93%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:30:55 PB821/1542Beat 47%
↑ 405 days after Birmingham 2024 1:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:46 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:19 faster for everyone, so 1:33 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:19 faster This athlete4:46 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:01 PB74/470Beat 84%
-
Copenhagen14 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:21:03326/650Beat 50%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:23:48 PB60/96Beat 38%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:35:41459/846Beat 46%