Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 0:49 on Sarah Wemyss and Keira Wemyss.
The clock says 0:50 faster, but the races themselves got 1:39 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Keira Wemyss, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:01416/680Beat 39%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Keira Wemyss 0:49 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:39 faster for everyone, so 0:49 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:39 faster This pair0:50 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:51337/488Beat 31%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:22:43510/1618Beat 69%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Rosanne Petersen 3:37 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:37 behind the field: 5:23 slower on the clock, against 1:46 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 slower This pair5:23 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:17:20 PB499/1887Beat 74%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:51 PB702/1372Beat 49%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:11235/1051Beat 78%