Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and Rome 2026, Nicola Craggs lost 15:12 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:50 quicker, so 7:22 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 224 days between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025, cost 1:59 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
12 races · 12 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Women1:24:5557/87Beat 35%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Open · Women1:52:34265/334Beat 21%
↑ 183 days after London Olympia 2026 10:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:05 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:01 slower for everyone: 10:04 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:01 slower This athlete12:05 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:25:09 PB199/430Beat 54%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:40:29 PB356/581Beat 39%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 3:06 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:44 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:38 faster for everyone, so 3:06 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:38 faster This athlete6:44 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:47:13199/268Beat 26%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 3:18 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:35 faster for everyone: 3:18 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete1:43 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:471455/1887Beat 23%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:45:30624/829Beat 25%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 1:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:59 behind the field: 1:15 slower on the clock, against 0:44 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 faster This athlete1:15 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:44:15626/830Beat 25%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 2:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:54 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:54 faster This athlete0:57 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:45:12660/940Beat 30%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:44:13533/747Beat 29%
↑ 252 days after Glasgow 2024 15:50 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
16:14 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:24 faster for everyone, so 15:50 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:24 faster This athlete16:14 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:40:19843/973Beat 13%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women2:00:27743/816Beat 9%