Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 6:45 on amy parsons and Sarah Parsons.
The clock says 3:03 slower, but the races themselves got 3:42 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:33:24308/399Beat 23%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:30:581097/1599Beat 31%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Sarah Parsons 1:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:37 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:53 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair0:37 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:31:35787/1111Beat 29%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025, with Sarah Parsons 4:52 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:40 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:12 faster for everyone: 4:52 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair3:40 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:55 PB355/529Beat 33%