Progress against the field
From Manchester 2024 to Cardiff 2026, Emily Sweeney and Katie McMahon got 8:41 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:35 quicker, so 16:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
390 days between Manchester 2024 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:06 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:19:02 PB199/301Beat 34%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:53 PB43/265Beat 84%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Katie McMahon 7:35 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:48 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:13 faster for everyone, so 7:35 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 faster This pair8:48 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:41666/1599Beat 58%
↑ 390 days after Manchester 2024, with Katie McMahon 1:06 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:06 better than the field: 7:28 faster on the clock, against 6:22 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →6:22 faster This pair7:28 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:30:09356/486Beat 27%