Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Lucy Weir and Danielle McKinven lost 4:13 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:57 quicker, so 0:16 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:08:4637/862Beat 96%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026, with Danielle McKinven 4:06 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:53 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:59 faster for everyone, which leaves this 4:06 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:59 faster This pair0:53 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:37 PB106/1084Beat 90%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:09:3970/1155Beat 94%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Danielle McKinven 0:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:09 slower on the clock, and the race was 1:02 slower for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:02 slower This pair1:09 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:30 PB68/1599Beat 96%