Progress against the field
Between Belgium 2025 and Maastricht 2026, Dianne Weijmans lost 0:21 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:25 quicker, so 3:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Individual Open · Women1:06:13 PB1/201Beat 100%
↑ 365 days after Maastricht 2025 0:56 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:57 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:01 faster for everyone, so 0:56 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:01 faster This athlete3:57 faster -
Paris GP23 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Women1:10:59 PB14/284Beat 95%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:11:569/44Beat 80%
↑ 54 days after Utrecht 2025 1:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:50 faster for everyone, so 1:17 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:50 faster This athlete3:33 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:36 PB17/863Beat 98%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Women1:15:297/67Beat 90%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:10:103/348Beat 99%
↑ 167 days after Belgium 2025 1:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:53 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:24 faster for everyone: 1:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:24 faster This athlete0:53 slower -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:178/765Beat 99%