Progress against the field
From London 2023 to Malaga 2025, the field gained 6:34 on Nicola McClenaghan and John McClenaghan.
Over the same races everyone got 3:06 quicker, so 3:28 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 334 days between London 2023 and Birmingham 2024, still ended 2:32 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women2:22:56 PB476/477Beat 0%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed2:21:16691/693Beat 0%
↑ 147 days after Birmingham 2024, with John McClenaghan 9:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:06 behind the field: 6:13 slower on the clock, against 2:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:53 faster This pair6:13 slower -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed2:15:03 PB891/894Beat 0%
↑ 334 days after London 2023, with John McClenaghan 2:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:45 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:13 faster for everyone, so 2:32 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:13 faster This pair2:45 faster -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed2:17:48908/909Beat 0%