Progress against the field
From Maastricht 2024 to Amsterdam 2024, the field gained 1:53 on Samantha Van Peer - Van Trijp and Rens Van Peer.
Over the same races everyone got 3:22 quicker, so 1:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 11 events
-
Cologne16 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:10:54 PB44/276Beat 84%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:11:0817/102Beat 83%
-
Heerenveen9 May 2025Relay · Women1:05:323/42Beat 93%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:27226/633Beat 64%
-
Frankfurt14 Dec 2024Doubles Pro · Women1:16:1331/80Beat 61%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:06 PB219/618Beat 65%
↑ 264 days after Maastricht 2024, with Rens Van Peer 1:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:29 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:22 faster for everyone, so 1:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:22 faster This pair1:29 faster -
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Individual Open · Women1:28:37 PB205/585Beat 65%
-
Maastricht20 Jan 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:3590/230Beat 61%
-
Frankfurt9 Dec 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:49161/288Beat 44%
-
Amsterdam4 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:57166/283Beat 41%
-
Amsterdam22 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Women1:23:26 PB78/172Beat 55%