Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and London Excel 2025, Katie Macaulay and Katie Puplett lost 1:41 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:30 quicker, so 0:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:08:34 PB32/226Beat 86%
-
Toulouse19 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:11:0213/66Beat 80%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:11:0348/183Beat 74%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:01 PB58/1599Beat 96%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Katie Puplett 1:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:41 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair0:49 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:5039/904Beat 96%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:19:15194/796Beat 76%
-
Malaga13 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Women1:22:53126/295Beat 57%