Progress against the field
Between Turin 2026 and Bologna 2026, Gianluca Trucco and Conor Eglington lost 1:48 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:12 quicker, so 0:24 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:21:21815/1035Beat 21%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Men1:35:2075/79Beat 5%
-
Oslo26 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Men1:14:38 PB258/490Beat 47%
-
Bologna4 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:14:45301/482Beat 38%
↑ 64 days after Turin 2026, with Conor Eglington 1:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:24 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:12 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:48 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:12 faster This pair0:24 faster -
Turin30 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:15:09635/1060Beat 40%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men1:21:56629/775Beat 19%
-
Milan19 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:34:14 PB817/1370Beat 40%