Progress against the field
From Vienna 2026 to Rome 2026, the field gained 0:57 on Beckie Hodgson and Jordan Burgess.
Over the same races everyone got 1:55 quicker, so 0:58 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Jordan Burgess, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:12:52 PB128/301Beat 58%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:37 PB23/248Beat 91%
↑ 229 days after Vienna 2026, with Jordan Burgess 0:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:55 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This pair0:58 faster -
Bologna4 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:10:29 PB35/485Beat 93%
-
Vienna6 Feb 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:3585/961Beat 91%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:17:3841/198Beat 79%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Amy Follos 3:12 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:12 behind the field: 4:14 slower on the clock, against 1:02 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:02 slower This pair4:14 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:24211/1599Beat 87%