Progress against the field
From Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 to EMEA London Olympia 2026, the field gained 5:47 on Roger Reid.
The clock says 6:12 faster, but the races themselves got 11:59 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 → Birmingham 2024: 4:44 in 174 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
10 races · 10 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:15:08323/693Beat 53%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 1:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:25 behind the field: 0:39 slower on the clock, against 0:46 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:46 faster This athlete0:39 slower -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:08:30360/958Beat 62%
↑ 132 days after Dublin 2025 3:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:55 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:56 faster for everyone: 3:51 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:56 faster This athlete2:55 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:14:29220/462Beat 52%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 3:33 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:33 behind the field: 1:38 slower on the clock, against 1:55 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This athlete1:38 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:35 PB32/468Beat 93%
↑ 193 days after London 2025 0:50 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:42 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:32 faster for everyone, so 0:50 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:32 faster This athlete1:42 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:12:51 PB72/156Beat 54%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:17175/1917Beat 91%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 2:15 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:15 better than the field: 4:22 faster on the clock, against 2:07 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:07 faster This athlete4:22 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:11:39282/1588Beat 82%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 6:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:24 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:51 faster for everyone: 6:15 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This athlete2:24 slower -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:09:15146/1637Beat 91%
↑ 35 days after Birmingham 2024 1:50 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:50 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This athlete0:50 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:10:05172/1916Beat 91%
↑ 174 days after Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 4:44 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:37 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:07 slower for everyone: 4:44 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:07 slower This athlete4:37 faster -
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Individual Open · Men1:14:42423/1860Beat 77%