Progress against the field
From Malaga 2025 to London Excel 2025, Stephanie Beer got 4:58 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:18 quicker, so 10:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Malaga 2025 → Cardiff 2025: 5:20 in 70 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Women1:14:55 PB55/257Beat 79%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 0:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 better than the field: 3:46 faster on the clock, against 3:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:24 faster This athlete3:46 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:18:4120/83Beat 76%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:09 PB82/1379Beat 94%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 0:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:52 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 0:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This athlete1:52 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:16:0175/587Beat 87%
↑ 70 days after Malaga 2025 5:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:04 faster for everyone, so 5:20 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete8:24 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:24:2573/281Beat 74%