Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and London Olympia 2026, Jasmine Gillespie lost 9:39 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:16 quicker, so 2:23 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:19:3782/493Beat 83%
↑ 13 days after Glasgow 2026 6:26 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:34 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:52 faster for everyone: 6:26 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:52 faster This athlete2:34 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:08 PB97/1618Beat 94%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:17:0320/324Beat 94%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 2:57 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:37 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:20 faster for everyone: 2:57 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete2:37 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:26 PB136/1542Beat 91%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 0:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:48 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:04 faster for everyone, so 0:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete2:48 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:1421/380Beat 95%