Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and London Olympia 2026, Daniel Garlick pulled 0:32 ahead of the field.
The clock says 4:04 faster, but the races themselves got 3:32 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:13:24 PB165/897Beat 82%
↑ 13 days after Glasgow 2026 0:38 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 0:38 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This athlete1:36 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:00369/1452Beat 75%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 0:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:34 faster on the clock, against 2:25 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete2:34 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:14 PB178/794Beat 78%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:17:34511/1463Beat 65%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:01 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:06 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:07 slower for everyone: 1:01 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete0:06 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:17:28978/2779Beat 65%