Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 0:58 on Robert Fahrenheim.
Over the same races everyone got 2:01 quicker, so 1:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:46 PB51/484Beat 90%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:05:10 PB86/467Beat 82%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 0:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:01 faster for everyone, so 0:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:01 faster This athlete1:03 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:06:1312/112Beat 89%
-
London26 Nov 2023Individual Pro · Men1:08:0838/321Beat 88%
↑ 372 days after London 2022 4:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:04 faster for everyone: 4:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:04 faster This athlete2:43 slower -
London19 Nov 2022Individual Pro · Men1:05:2513/99Beat 87%
↑ 35 days after Birmingham 2022 0:05 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 0:57 faster on the clock, against 1:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:02 faster This athlete0:57 faster -
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Individual Pro · Men1:06:227/137Beat 95%